Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- start:induction_module:blue_group [2021/04/29 18:01] – created boessenkool_karin
+++ start:induction_module:blue_group [2025/03/14 18:01] (current) – removed boessenkool_karin
@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-**Blue Group on 'Publications and the role of co-authors'**\\
-\\
-**Resources:**\\
-Please use the information provided in the 'Good Scientific Practice' section.\\
-\\
-**Questions:**\\
-\\
-. When does a scientist become a co- author?\\
-\\
-. What is an honorary authorship?\\
-\\
-. Who decides about authorships on a paper? When?\\
-\\
-. a) Is it likely that you will have co-authors in parts of your dissertation?\\
-b) Imagine that you will have first-author paper with 3 co-authors as a part of your dissertation. Why do you think the doctoral office (Promotionsbüro) asks to indicate which part of the work for this paper __you__ have done?\\
-. You need auxiliary data for your model runs / to support your measurement results and get it from a colleague. Should this person become a co-author? Why (not)?\\
-\\
-. Read the following real-life story: \\
-The reviewer of a manuscript contacts the last co‐author on the manuscript directly after finishing his/her review:\\
-“//Dear [last co‐author on manuscript],\\
-I just finished a review of a manuscript to [journal] your name was on, which left me uneasy.\\
-The manuscript was out of character compared to the work of yours I know and appreciate. I send you the review (attached) so that you know first‐hand what are my problems with the manuscript. I simply hope you didn't have the time to go through the manuscript in detail before it was submitted by [first author]. Just let me know what your thoughts are. Thank you.\\
-Best wishes, [reviewer]// “\\
-\\
-The answer came swiftly:\\
-//“Hi [reviewer],
-Thanks for bringing this to my attention. Frankly I am shocked, as I had not seen this manuscript nor was I even aware that it existed. I did some (…) analyses for [second author] and his student [first author], but never heard any feedback from them after sending [second author] a summary of the results. Thus I have no idea what the implications of my data might be, or whether they've been interpreted reasonably.\\
-Obviously this is a serious matter that gives me a very bad taste. I appreciate your letting me know. I would have been extremely pissed off to see it for the first time printed in [journal]!\\
-Regards, [last co‐author on manuscript]”//\\
-\\
-a) What went wrong?\\
-b) What should [first author] have done?\\
-c) What should [second author] have done?\\
-d) Do you agree with the reviewer’s action?\\
-\\