Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- start:induction_module:red_group [2021/06/22 11:00] – boessenkool_karin
+++ start:induction_module:red_group [2025/03/14 18:04] (current) – removed boessenkool_karin
@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-**Red Group on 'Ideas'**\\
-\\
-**Resources:**\\
-  * Please use the information provided in the [[start:good_scientific_practice|Good scientific practice]] section of the wiki.\\
-  * [[https://publicationethics.org/files/plagiarism%20B.pdf|COPE Guideline for editors on suspected plagiarism in a published manuscript]]\\
-\\
-**Questions:**\\
-\\
-. During the discussion following a fellow student’s talk in your institute colloquium a great idea develops, which is potentially very important for your project.\\
-a) Imagine, the presenter does not do anything with this idea. What do you do?\\
-b) Imagine that the presenter decides to write a paper about it. Should everyone who was present during the discussion be a co-author? Why (not)?\\
-c) Should the presenter’s supervisor be the first author? Why (not)?\\
-\\
-. Self-plagiarism\\
-a) What is it?\\
-b) Why is it a problem?\\
-c) How can you avoid it?\\
-\\
-. There are people who only give a talk or present a poster on research the have already published.\\
-a) Why would they do that?\\
-b) Why is this behaviour understandable?\\
-c) Why is this a pity?\\
-d) Would you present unpublished data at a conference?\\
-\\
-. What other situations can you think of where you might run into trouble regarding your own or other people’s ideas?\\
-\\
-**Resources: please use the general resources in the "Good Scientific Practice" section of the Wiki**